Abstract-only review · 2014
Protein and energy in betta diets: growth versus body composition
Higher dietary protein did not improve all growth measurements in this short betta trial.
Review scope
This summary is based on the published abstract. We have not appraised the full methods, tables or supplementary material. Details absent from the abstract remain unverified.
Question and design
56 male betta fingerlings, individually housed, over 30 days. Four digestible-protein levels from 28% to 49%, at two energy levels. Comparator: Alternative protein and energy combinations.
What was measured?
Weight gain, feed intake, conversion, protein efficiency and growth rate.
Main findings
Weight gain, feed conversion and specific growth rate did not differ significantly. Feed intake and protein efficiency varied across diets.
Study strengths
Randomised factorial design with individual fish as experimental units.
Limitations
Short, male-only juvenile study. Digestible nutrient specifications cannot be read directly from crude-protein labels.
Researchers’ conclusion
The authors favoured the lowest tested protein and energy combination under these conditions.
Evidence.pet interpretation
The study does not define a lifelong optimum for all bettas and cannot be applied to goldfish.
Funding and conflicts
Not verified from the abstract; full declarations have not been reviewed.
Source and review date
Lemos MVA et al. Effects of digestible protein to energy ratios on growth and carcass chemical composition of siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens). Ciência e Agrotecnologia. 2014;38(1).
Read the primary source · DOI record
STU-044. Reviewed 25 September 2026. Next review 25 December 2026.
